112.
surely, his personal Attornies Messrs Stephens and Holmes having first approved the draft, Mr Holmes in Court stating that he was already acting for him as well as defending for the King. The King's share of the Compromise that His Majesty was a party to the arrangement, was not to be considered a dealarning lest he should weaken his Claim for Compensation; and to his officers remaining in Command of the Fangwee upon the dissolution of the arrangement, this acknowledging him as the debtor, and in admitting that the proceedings against the King were wrong from beginning to end. The submissions by the King are said to be seven in number.
Submission 1. The appearance by Mr. Stephens for the King without protest in November 1873. Mr. Stephens appeared on behalf of Un Sai Kwan who claimed to have a better right than Homan Chung to represent the King in the suit. Mr Stephens however did not contest the attachment: It surely would seem that any argument as to about the King's liabilities to Mr Landstein a private trader would have been out of time and out of place after Paulus Due Hau had admitted in Court that he and not the King had incurred the liabilities and after the plaintiff had agreed never was unable to obtain the conduct of the case for his client, who had the costs of his attempt, and the Chief Justice was not well satisfied with this misguided attempt to supersede Mr Brereton as the defendants' Attorney. It is very much to be regretted that
112.
surely, his personal Attomies Mefs? Stephens and Holmes having first approved the draft, mr Hohnes in Court
stating
that he
ivas
1- already acting for hai Tive
að
well as defending for the King. The King's share of
confined to his Consel
dealarning
was not to be considered a
the Compromise that His Majesty
was
• to the arrangement,
party
lest he should weaken his
Claim for Compensation; and to his officers reaming
Command of the Fangwee upon
the dissolution of-
179
effect
in Court to accept payment from Pantus, this acknowledging him as the debtor, and in achmitting that the proceedings against the King were wrong from beginning to end. The submissions by the King
be seven in mumber.
are said to
Submission 1. The appearance by Mr. Stephens
for the
1873.
King without protest in November 18 Mr. Stephens appearect on behalf of Un Sai
Kwan who claimed to have a better
a better right than
Homan Chung to represent the thing in the suit.
Mr Stephens however
the attachment:
It surely would
seem
that
any argument
as
a
to
- about the Kings liabilities to Mr Landstein
| private trader would have been out of time and
حمرا
out of place after Paulus Due Hau had admitted in Court that he and not the King had imeuned the liabilities and after the plaintiff had agreed
vever was unable to obtain the
conduct of the cance
pay
Justice
cance for his client, who had the costs of his attempt, and the Chief
was not well satisfied with this manstaned
attempt to supersede Mr Brereton as the defendants'
Attorney
It
is
very much to be regretted
regretted that
the
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.